Developer Pays Blackstone Tap Fee Day before Deadline

J. David McCormack, developer of Blackstone Lofts, is a partner in Echelon Resources, which proposes to develop Cape Charles Lofts in the old school at Central Park. (Wave photo)

By GEORGE SOUTHERN
Cape Charles Wave

September 27, 2012

Today is the day that residents of Blackstone Lofts were dreading.

Blackstone VA Town Council voted a month ago to turn off the Lofts’ water supply if the developer did not pay the connection fee by September 27.

The Blackstone Lofts developer is J. David McCormack, who is also a partner in Echelon Resources, Inc.

Echelon has a contract with the Town of Cape Charles to convert the old school at Central Park into an apartment building to be called Cape Charles Lofts.

According to Blackstone Town Council minutes, Town Manager Philip Vannoorbeeck admitted that the town was at fault for issuing a building permit for Blackstone Lofts without first receiving payment for the water and sewer connection fees.

The town has been trying to get McCormack to pay ever since. Last March, the town council gave him 30 days to pay, but did not enforce its demand.

Manager Vannoorbeeck told the town council he had both talked to McCormack and informed him in writing, “which is not endearing him to the town,” according to the minutes.

On August 27, the town council gave McCormack another 30-day deadline, and this time made sure he knew they meant it. Failure to pay meant the water would be turned off, period.

McCormack told the Wave September 3 that he definitely intended to pay the connection fee but was negotiating the terms.

Yesterday Blackstone Mayor Billy Coleburn told the Wave that McCormack had just delivered a check to the town manager for $38,000. He earlier had paid $2,000, and this covered the balance.

The Wave has been covering the Blackstone connection fee issue because of the parallels with Cape Charles.

CONTINUED FROM FIRST PAGE

McCormack converted an abandoned tobacco warehouse in Blackstone into “luxury lofts.” He proposes to do the same with the old school and Central Park property in Cape Charles.

In Blackstone, McCormack received a building permit without paying a connection fee. Cape Charles Town Council has passed a special ordinance allowing him to do the same thing here.

Cape Charles town code requires payment of water and sewer connection fees at time of issuance of a building permit — unless Town Council authorizes a special payment arrangement. Town Manager Heather Arcos confirmed to the Wave that according to the same ordinance, even with a special arrangement the connection fees must be paid no later than the time of actual hookup of the water and sewer lines.

But on June 14, Town Council passed a special ordinance overriding the normal rules. McCormack and his partner, Edwin Gaskin, will not have to pay water and sewer connection fees until issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Cape Charles Lofts.

It is not clear whether the developers must pay before receiving a temporary occupancy certificate or a permanent one. Hotel Cape Charles, for instance, has been open for three months without receiving a permanent certificate of occupancy.

On March 10, Town staff distributed a list of 10 “Frequently Asked Questions.” Question #9 was: “Why would the Town give the property to the developer at essentially no cost?”

The answer provided was: “The project is financially viable through the application of Federal and State historic tax credits and if the property is conveyed essentially free.”

But Town documents obtained through the Virginia Freedom of Information Act reveal that in secret negotiations with Town staff, Echelon partners Gaskin and McCormack were delivering a different message: Getting the building for free was not enough — they needed a $200,000 cash payout from the Town as well.

Manager Arcos and Assistant Town Manager Bob Panek suggested cutting water and sewer connection fees by 50 percent. That would equal $105,000. And they also offered to pay Echelon $41,000 insurance money received from earthquake damage to the school.

But Echelon needed $52,000 more. Arcos suggested the Town could pay that out over a three-year period.

In the April 3 email below, Gaskin applauded Arcos’ “creative suggestion” that “is going to keep this thing from falling apart.”

________________________________________________________________________________________

According to Gaskin’s email, it would be up to Bob Panek to “make the $52K happen.”

And Panek did make it happen. He persuaded Town Council to pass a second ordinance specifically for Echelon, reducing their connection fee a further 50 percent — resulting in a further $52,500 cash saving.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Now, McCormack and Gaskin have only to pay the Town $52,500 for connection fees on a deferred basis — similar to what ultimately happened in Blackstone.

Share

Comments

3 Responses to “Developer Pays Blackstone Tap Fee Day before Deadline”

  1. Bruce Lindeman on September 27th, 2012 7:03 am

    So, the part about this project being financially viable if the property is given to the developer essentially for free is what I think the Town Council owes us more detail about. What does “financially viable” mean? Is it simply that there will be positive income to the Town via taxes, etc.? If so, how many years before the Town’s investment is paid back and we begin seeing this positive income?

    Has ANY analysis been done to determine the relative value of this deal from a revenue perspective? Also, the argument that many have on this issue is still valid: why wasn’t this sale done competitively to determine the best deal for the Town and to maximize the Town’s (and taxpayers’) investment?

    Lastly, the diversion of funds from other projects to fund this deal and the Bank of America building is troubling. It’s the old, robbing Peter to pay Paul thing. I realize these kinds of trade-offs occur all the time in municiple governments. However, there should be a threshold at which the Town should be required to get taxpayer input. Do most taxpayers, for example, really want money that was planned to be used to upgrade our street lights used to restore the bank building instead? I wonder. I know that I don’t.

    I think you can argue either side of this issue but it’s the lack of transparency about these deals that makes me squirm. Thanks, George, for keeping the light shining on this stuff.

  2. Dana Lascu on September 27th, 2012 11:59 am

    Even if we are not getting totally screwed, it mostly feels like it. The Town needs to hire a public relations agency (alternatively, a shrink) to change this perception.

  3. Jean Johnson on September 27th, 2012 6:00 pm

    Sounds like McCormack and Echelon operate with minimal cash cushions for their projects. What happens if there are construction delays and overruns on the school project? (I remember seeing in a recent Wave article that the Hotel Cape Charles budget ballooned from I believe $600K to over $2M. ) What if rental demand isn’t as robust as expected among the fisherman second-home crowd or young teachers? Does the town have a contingency plan in the event of project non-completion or bankruptcy?