<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SHORE THING Put Your Money on the Mantelpiece</title>
	<atom:link href="https://capecharleswave.com/2012/07/shore-thing-put-your-money-on-the-mantelpiece/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2012/07/shore-thing-put-your-money-on-the-mantelpiece/</link>
	<description>Your Online Newspaper in Cape Charles, Virginia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 21:55:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Kuzma, Jr.</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2012/07/shore-thing-put-your-money-on-the-mantelpiece/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Kuzma, Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=814#comment-300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An analysis of the highest and best use would dictate that the building be used for Commercial purposes, not non-taxable municipal/county property.

So, on the sole commercial street in Cape Charles, you will now have TWO large, non-tax paying buildings; the Town Hall, and the new library.

Hey, I LOVE libraries......reading all the time......but wouldn&#039;t the old Cape Charles School building be a FAR better choice for the Municipal services? Town Hall, FD, PD and Library?

Let&#039;s see.........the old fire house could be sold as a possible Dance/Nightclub spot, the bank would be a great bar/restaurant and both of those would throw off both Town and Sales taxes.

And bring in people who will spend $$$ at other establishents.....which will throw off sales taxes....................I mean rather than have to go hat in hand, begging the Feds or the State for money.......Cape Charles has always struck me as a town full of American MEN and WOMEN who can do for themselves,no?

Just a thought........]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An analysis of the highest and best use would dictate that the building be used for Commercial purposes, not non-taxable municipal/county property.</p>
<p>So, on the sole commercial street in Cape Charles, you will now have TWO large, non-tax paying buildings; the Town Hall, and the new library.</p>
<p>Hey, I LOVE libraries&#8230;&#8230;reading all the time&#8230;&#8230;but wouldn&#8217;t the old Cape Charles School building be a FAR better choice for the Municipal services? Town Hall, FD, PD and Library?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;the old fire house could be sold as a possible Dance/Nightclub spot, the bank would be a great bar/restaurant and both of those would throw off both Town and Sales taxes.</p>
<p>And bring in people who will spend $$$ at other establishents&#8230;..which will throw off sales taxes&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..I mean rather than have to go hat in hand, begging the Feds or the State for money&#8230;&#8230;.Cape Charles has always struck me as a town full of American MEN and WOMEN who can do for themselves,no?</p>
<p>Just a thought&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen K. Fox</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2012/07/shore-thing-put-your-money-on-the-mantelpiece/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen K. Fox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=814#comment-298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the writer has confused the Section 2232 requirement for Planning Commission action.  That section relates to putting a public use in place from a Zoning perspective.  It has nothing to do with a decision to enter into a purchase contract.  It is simply a land use tool that requires a review by the Planning Commission before placing a public use.  There remains an opportunity to conduct such a hearing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the writer has confused the Section 2232 requirement for Planning Commission action.  That section relates to putting a public use in place from a Zoning perspective.  It has nothing to do with a decision to enter into a purchase contract.  It is simply a land use tool that requires a review by the Planning Commission before placing a public use.  There remains an opportunity to conduct such a hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
