Comments on: TOWN COUNCIL Cape Charles Endorses Highway Sewer Hookups

By: Andy Spagnuolo

Andy Spagnuolo — Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:14:34 +0000

I believe we do not want to replicate what exists in Exmore at the expense of more business development in Cape Charles. So on that note I tend to agree with the concerns noted by others. What is the motive behind expanding service to Route 13? Is it the desire to add service to an under-utilized system thereby bringing down costs for all customers? If so, has a business case analysis or study been considered or acted upon to ensure that increasing the customer base beyond Cape Charles and Bay Creek Community leads to reduced costs? What comes to mind is the intensive infrastructure that would be required to serve others beyond the Town and Bay Creek, i.e., right-of-way issues, environmental impact, piping, number of pumping stations and thier construction, life cycle and associated maintenance costs. In consideration of the limited customer base beyond the Town’s boundaries, the capital investment and life cycle costs could result in no advantage in customer cost reduction. This plan needs to be vetted.

By: S J Walker

S J Walker — Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:36:54 +0000

Long term thinking isn’t happening here. Cape Charles providing sewer service for commercial development on the highway? A new hotel at the light, then why would anybody drive into town? Put up a Chili’s or a TGIF, and there goes your pub, and probably a couple of restaurants. A little strip mall with a gift shop, a beauty shop and a specialty food store, and there goes half of Mason Ave. A Rite Aid drug store? That would be the end of Rayfields. And pigs will be flying over the marina before your sewer and water bills go down just because you have a few new customers. What were you thinking?

By: Bob Meyers

Bob Meyers — Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:33:05 +0000

Congratulations, you have taken a big step toward becoming the business size & quality of downtown Cheriton. Isn’t sewage a wonderful vehicle? At least Roger seems to have a grasp on the issues at stake.

By: Marita Patterson

Marita Patterson — Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:08:10 +0000

Was there any public comment at the meeting?

(Yes — look for the Wave’s further Council report on Monday — EDITOR)

By: Roger L. Munz

Roger L. Munz — Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:57:38 +0000

From an economic as well as a planning viewpoint this seems counter to the Town’s needs and best interest. During my four years on the Planning Commission, the development of Mason Avenue business was paramount. Has that changed in the past four months? In voting for this, the Town Council may have opened a Pandora’s box that they will find increasingly harder to close as time passes. The Town Council needs to consider today’s decision in light of future consequences. Sometimes things are not what they seem; one must look under today’s information for underlying causes — a result of the world we find ourselves living in. Sometimes going for the $$ in the short term leaves you with a long-term problem. I would think changing the blanket concept to one granted on a case-by-case basis as the need arises would allow greater control and management.