<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: County, Cheriton Urged to Rethink Cape Charles Sewerage</title>
	<atom:link href="https://capecharleswave.com/2013/08/county-and-cheriton-urged-to-rethink-cape-charles-sewer-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/08/county-and-cheriton-urged-to-rethink-cape-charles-sewer-plan/</link>
	<description>Your Online Newspaper in Cape Charles, Virginia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 21:55:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Boyd</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/08/county-and-cheriton-urged-to-rethink-cape-charles-sewer-plan/#comment-18230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Boyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 21:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=8648#comment-18230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the biggest problems with this sewer plant is they insisted on designing it for an increasing population that doesn&#039;t exist. At first, the Cape Charles sewer plant was designed for 500,000 gallons per day, then they dropped it to a stated capacity of 250,000 gpd, but one that could be readily upgraded to 500,000 gpd (i.e. it is really still the 500,000 gpd capacity in many respects). 

The real usage is 150,000-160,000 gpd. None of the politicians seems to accept that the populations of Northampton County, Cape Charles, and Cheriton have all been shrinking for the past 50-80 years. Guess what -- that means we don&#039;t need to build the plant for 3 times the current population (160,000 gallons vs. 500,000 gallons/day). Does it take a rocket scientist to see that if you build a plant several times larger than needed, it will cost more to run? 

Now that Panek has convinced Cape Charles to build this plant larger than necessary because of &quot;free grant funds falling from the sky,&quot; they have suddenly discovered it costs more than they thought to run it, so they want to inflict the cost of their poorly thought-out plans on the rest of the county. Personally, I&#039;m not in favor of paying for their poor planning. 

Don&#039;t trust their &quot;interpretation&quot; of the survey results, either -- they claim 5 positive responses out of 64 surveys sent out is a majority of people in favor or their proposal. Seems like some remedial math is in order.

There also seems a clear conflict of interest with Panek serving as both the head of the PSA and the assistant town planner for Cape Charles -- of course he wants the county to bail him out of his boondoggle!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest problems with this sewer plant is they insisted on designing it for an increasing population that doesn&#8217;t exist. At first, the Cape Charles sewer plant was designed for 500,000 gallons per day, then they dropped it to a stated capacity of 250,000 gpd, but one that could be readily upgraded to 500,000 gpd (i.e. it is really still the 500,000 gpd capacity in many respects). </p>
<p>The real usage is 150,000-160,000 gpd. None of the politicians seems to accept that the populations of Northampton County, Cape Charles, and Cheriton have all been shrinking for the past 50-80 years. Guess what &#8212; that means we don&#8217;t need to build the plant for 3 times the current population (160,000 gallons vs. 500,000 gallons/day). Does it take a rocket scientist to see that if you build a plant several times larger than needed, it will cost more to run? </p>
<p>Now that Panek has convinced Cape Charles to build this plant larger than necessary because of &#8220;free grant funds falling from the sky,&#8221; they have suddenly discovered it costs more than they thought to run it, so they want to inflict the cost of their poorly thought-out plans on the rest of the county. Personally, I&#8217;m not in favor of paying for their poor planning. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t trust their &#8220;interpretation&#8221; of the survey results, either &#8212; they claim 5 positive responses out of 64 surveys sent out is a majority of people in favor or their proposal. Seems like some remedial math is in order.</p>
<p>There also seems a clear conflict of interest with Panek serving as both the head of the PSA and the assistant town planner for Cape Charles &#8212; of course he wants the county to bail him out of his boondoggle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Bender</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/08/county-and-cheriton-urged-to-rethink-cape-charles-sewer-plan/#comment-18100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deborah Bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=8648#comment-18100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think our sewer rates will really go down you must not know much about how this town operates!  Whenever they have the chance to raise taxes or water/sewer rates they do. Welcome to Cape Charles  -- Now get out your wallet!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think our sewer rates will really go down you must not know much about how this town operates!  Whenever they have the chance to raise taxes or water/sewer rates they do. Welcome to Cape Charles  &#8212; Now get out your wallet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Rea</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/08/county-and-cheriton-urged-to-rethink-cape-charles-sewer-plan/#comment-18063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Rea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=8648#comment-18063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would someone help me understand her point? A larger volume in the plant will make it operate more efficiently and lower the cost for everyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would someone help me understand her point? A larger volume in the plant will make it operate more efficiently and lower the cost for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
