<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official Wrangling Over Old School Continues (in Fine Print)</title>
	<atom:link href="https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/official-wrangling-over-old-school-continues-in-fine-print/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/official-wrangling-over-old-school-continues-in-fine-print/</link>
	<description>Your Online Newspaper in Cape Charles, Virginia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 21:55:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenora Mitchell</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/official-wrangling-over-old-school-continues-in-fine-print/#comment-24147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lenora Mitchell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=9542#comment-24147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m just a little confused here.  The appeal was filed to the Town Council, who didn&#039;t get it because it  was hijacked by staff, who said it should be rejected based on reasons that they cited. Then they included the info in the meeting packet, making a recommendation to the Council to reject the appeal (which would be an action), but not requiring any action because the staff had already made the decision, so it was only included in the packet as an &quot;information&quot; item.  Is that what happened?

&lt;em&gt;-- That is exactly right. The Wave&#039;s report of the meeting will appear soon. --EDITOR&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just a little confused here.  The appeal was filed to the Town Council, who didn&#8217;t get it because it  was hijacked by staff, who said it should be rejected based on reasons that they cited. Then they included the info in the meeting packet, making a recommendation to the Council to reject the appeal (which would be an action), but not requiring any action because the staff had already made the decision, so it was only included in the packet as an &#8220;information&#8221; item.  Is that what happened?</p>
<p><em>&#8211; That is exactly right. The Wave&#8217;s report of the meeting will appear soon. &#8211;EDITOR</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Downs</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/official-wrangling-over-old-school-continues-in-fine-print/#comment-23707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Downs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=9542#comment-23707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t wait for the Virginia Supreme Court to hear the case from Old School Cape Charles. Hopefully, after a decision is heard, it won&#039;t matter what the &quot;leaders&quot; of town government think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait for the Virginia Supreme Court to hear the case from Old School Cape Charles. Hopefully, after a decision is heard, it won&#8217;t matter what the &#8220;leaders&#8221; of town government think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
