<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VACATION RENTALS: License to Kill the Golden Goose?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/vacation-rentals-license-to-kill-the-golden-goose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/vacation-rentals-license-to-kill-the-golden-goose/</link>
	<description>Your Online Newspaper in Cape Charles, Virginia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 21:55:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Lascu</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/vacation-rentals-license-to-kill-the-golden-goose/#comment-21742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Lascu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=9379#comment-21742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great idea, Linda. That would clear up the congestion and create revenue for the town. As an East Side dweller, it would provide me with an incentive to walk to see the sunset, rather than do a quick drive by and pollute the environment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea, Linda. That would clear up the congestion and create revenue for the town. As an East Side dweller, it would provide me with an incentive to walk to see the sunset, rather than do a quick drive by and pollute the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Downs</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/vacation-rentals-license-to-kill-the-golden-goose/#comment-21618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linda Downs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=9379#comment-21618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish to comment to the parking space requirement.  Obviously, B&amp;B&#039;s, etc. need loading and unloading spaces for their guests.  That&#039;s common courtesy.  I think a bigger issue is the parking of visitor cars who come to town (not to partake in our eateries or to browse and buy at our shops) to use the well-publicized public beach and fishing pier.  They park along the beach front and when it&#039;s full, they park in the neighborhood taking up spaces from residents and paying renters.  

Personally, I don&#039;t know of any, Mid-Atlantic town-limit beach, which offers free parking. Many have paid lots or parking kiosks.  Cape Charles should implement the automated cash/credit card kiosk concept for daily beach visitors, with three units installed (at each end and one mid-way).   Residents would have a local sticker which exempts them from paying and perhaps a visitor pass for guests who come to see them.  Renters, hotel or B&amp;B guests could have a windshield permit issued when they check-in and retrieved when they checkout.   The parking proceeds could help to pay the costs of maintaining the beach and the town in general.  Local law enforcement could ticket those parked along the beach or in town without a sticker, windshield permit or kiosk parking stub, also earning revenue for the town from those who fail to participate.

Oh!  I&#039;ve heard the protests which declare, &quot;that would keep visitors away and the businesses would suffer.&quot;  As a former small business owner, I can attest to the fact that the majority of beach visitors are not visiting your businesses.  They are sunbathing, swimming, playing in the sand or fishing.

Wake up Cape Charles and run this place like a real town and benefit from the experiences of other beach communities who have, and continue to prosper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish to comment to the parking space requirement.  Obviously, B&amp;B&#8217;s, etc. need loading and unloading spaces for their guests.  That&#8217;s common courtesy.  I think a bigger issue is the parking of visitor cars who come to town (not to partake in our eateries or to browse and buy at our shops) to use the well-publicized public beach and fishing pier.  They park along the beach front and when it&#8217;s full, they park in the neighborhood taking up spaces from residents and paying renters.  </p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t know of any, Mid-Atlantic town-limit beach, which offers free parking. Many have paid lots or parking kiosks.  Cape Charles should implement the automated cash/credit card kiosk concept for daily beach visitors, with three units installed (at each end and one mid-way).   Residents would have a local sticker which exempts them from paying and perhaps a visitor pass for guests who come to see them.  Renters, hotel or B&amp;B guests could have a windshield permit issued when they check-in and retrieved when they checkout.   The parking proceeds could help to pay the costs of maintaining the beach and the town in general.  Local law enforcement could ticket those parked along the beach or in town without a sticker, windshield permit or kiosk parking stub, also earning revenue for the town from those who fail to participate.</p>
<p>Oh!  I&#8217;ve heard the protests which declare, &#8220;that would keep visitors away and the businesses would suffer.&#8221;  As a former small business owner, I can attest to the fact that the majority of beach visitors are not visiting your businesses.  They are sunbathing, swimming, playing in the sand or fishing.</p>
<p>Wake up Cape Charles and run this place like a real town and benefit from the experiences of other beach communities who have, and continue to prosper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Little</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/vacation-rentals-license-to-kill-the-golden-goose/#comment-21274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Little]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=9379#comment-21274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These comments are intended to correct some information presented in this article. First, Tom Bonadeo’s report was referring to houses in the Town that are not occupied full time. The houses his report references may be either empty all the time, used as vacation homes by the owner periodically, or rented as short term vacation rentals (this information is readily available from the US Census).  Therefore, the 402 homes referred to in the article are not all vacation rentals. The actual number listed for Cape Charles on the Homeaway.com website, the dominant aggregator of vacation rentals, is 121, and about 21 of those are not actually within the town limits of Cape Charles.  So, there are 100 vacation rental homes in Cape Charles.  Homeaway lists 61 properties for Chincoteague; therefore Chincoteague has only 39 fewer vacation rental homes than Cape Charles.  I don’t think you can draw much of a conclusion from a difference of about 39 properties without a great deal more research. 

Second, the article stated that the commission rate for managing short term or vacation rentals is 10%.  Actually, the commission rates range from about 17% to 23%.  

Third, related to the insinuation that there was something underhanded in the fact that two B&amp;B’s are grandfathered with regard to the parking requirements, both of those B&amp;B’s were permitted before the parking requirement was enacted. It is common practice that when a new or revised code would render a property non-compliant, the property would be grandfathered with conditions.

Additionally, if the Town began to enforce the business license, it would amount to no more than $50 or $60 a year for a vacation rental. The County calculates the personal property tax assessment on vacation rentals at the rate of $500 per room not counting bathrooms. On a 7 room house, the tax would amount to about $135 per year. All rental properties are required to have periodic Occupancy Permit inspections, both long term and short term.

Property managers for vacation rentals typically collect both Town and County occupancy taxes and State sales taxes and remit them to the proper agencies relieving the owners of those tasks and bookkeeping chores.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GEORGE SOUTHERN RESPONDS&lt;/strong&gt; -- Mr. Little’s expert commentary is always appreciated.  The figure of 402 vacation rental houses indeed seems too high, but that was the figure stated at the August 19, 2013, meeting of the Cape Charles Planning Commission, the minutes of which may be read here (see page 3): http://www.capecharles.org/documents/20130910-PCMtgAgendaPkt.pdf

The relevant quote is: “Bill Stramm read from a report compiled by the former Town Planner Tom Bonadeo which stated that the Town had 958 houses, 516 of which were occupied by full-time residents. 442 were unoccupied full-time but 402 of them were vacation rentals.”

The number of vacation rentals advertised at homeaway.com is a good indicator, but by no means is every Cape Charles rental advertised on that website. Bay Creek Realty (http://www.baycreekresort.com/resort/vacation-rentals/search/)
lists 37 homes for vacation rental, only a few of which are also advertised on homeaway.com. Other properties may be found listed exclusively on the websites of the five local vacation property managers listed in the story above. And some other properties in town rely on word of mouth and do not advertise at all. 

Regarding Chincoteague, we continue to believe it is relevant that a town with perhaps 10 times the rental business of Cape Charles nevertheless advertises 1/3 fewer owner-owned homes for rent on homeaway.com than in Cape Charles.

Our story did not intend to insinuate anything “underhanded” about the grandfathering of B&amp;Bs owned by current and former members of Town Council. The story simply stated: “Because those two B&amp;Bs were in existence before the parking ordinance was passed, they are grandfathered.”

Mr. Little writes, “IF the Town began to enforce the business license. . . .“  In fact, that was the point of the whole story, which in retrospect should have been better emphasized. The Town IS now trying to enforce the business license requirement on homeowners. The Town has mailed letters to property owners believed to be renting their houses, stating: “If your property is a short-term rental (i.e. weekly rental) you are required to obtain a Cape Charles Business License through the Treasurer’s Office.”  And the minutes of the August 15, 2013, Town Council meeting report “an ongoing collection effort to obtain unpaid business license taxes.”&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These comments are intended to correct some information presented in this article. First, Tom Bonadeo’s report was referring to houses in the Town that are not occupied full time. The houses his report references may be either empty all the time, used as vacation homes by the owner periodically, or rented as short term vacation rentals (this information is readily available from the US Census).  Therefore, the 402 homes referred to in the article are not all vacation rentals. The actual number listed for Cape Charles on the Homeaway.com website, the dominant aggregator of vacation rentals, is 121, and about 21 of those are not actually within the town limits of Cape Charles.  So, there are 100 vacation rental homes in Cape Charles.  Homeaway lists 61 properties for Chincoteague; therefore Chincoteague has only 39 fewer vacation rental homes than Cape Charles.  I don’t think you can draw much of a conclusion from a difference of about 39 properties without a great deal more research. </p>
<p>Second, the article stated that the commission rate for managing short term or vacation rentals is 10%.  Actually, the commission rates range from about 17% to 23%.  </p>
<p>Third, related to the insinuation that there was something underhanded in the fact that two B&amp;B’s are grandfathered with regard to the parking requirements, both of those B&amp;B’s were permitted before the parking requirement was enacted. It is common practice that when a new or revised code would render a property non-compliant, the property would be grandfathered with conditions.</p>
<p>Additionally, if the Town began to enforce the business license, it would amount to no more than $50 or $60 a year for a vacation rental. The County calculates the personal property tax assessment on vacation rentals at the rate of $500 per room not counting bathrooms. On a 7 room house, the tax would amount to about $135 per year. All rental properties are required to have periodic Occupancy Permit inspections, both long term and short term.</p>
<p>Property managers for vacation rentals typically collect both Town and County occupancy taxes and State sales taxes and remit them to the proper agencies relieving the owners of those tasks and bookkeeping chores.</p>
<p><em><strong>GEORGE SOUTHERN RESPONDS</strong> &#8212; Mr. Little’s expert commentary is always appreciated.  The figure of 402 vacation rental houses indeed seems too high, but that was the figure stated at the August 19, 2013, meeting of the Cape Charles Planning Commission, the minutes of which may be read here (see page 3): <a href="http://www.capecharles.org/documents/20130910-PCMtgAgendaPkt.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.capecharles.org/documents/20130910-PCMtgAgendaPkt.pdf</a></p>
<p>The relevant quote is: “Bill Stramm read from a report compiled by the former Town Planner Tom Bonadeo which stated that the Town had 958 houses, 516 of which were occupied by full-time residents. 442 were unoccupied full-time but 402 of them were vacation rentals.”</p>
<p>The number of vacation rentals advertised at homeaway.com is a good indicator, but by no means is every Cape Charles rental advertised on that website. Bay Creek Realty (<a href="http://www.baycreekresort.com/resort/vacation-rentals/search/" rel="nofollow">http://www.baycreekresort.com/resort/vacation-rentals/search/</a>)<br />
lists 37 homes for vacation rental, only a few of which are also advertised on homeaway.com. Other properties may be found listed exclusively on the websites of the five local vacation property managers listed in the story above. And some other properties in town rely on word of mouth and do not advertise at all. </p>
<p>Regarding Chincoteague, we continue to believe it is relevant that a town with perhaps 10 times the rental business of Cape Charles nevertheless advertises 1/3 fewer owner-owned homes for rent on homeaway.com than in Cape Charles.</p>
<p>Our story did not intend to insinuate anything “underhanded” about the grandfathering of B&#038;Bs owned by current and former members of Town Council. The story simply stated: “Because those two B&#038;Bs were in existence before the parking ordinance was passed, they are grandfathered.”</p>
<p>Mr. Little writes, “IF the Town began to enforce the business license. . . .“  In fact, that was the point of the whole story, which in retrospect should have been better emphasized. The Town IS now trying to enforce the business license requirement on homeowners. The Town has mailed letters to property owners believed to be renting their houses, stating: “If your property is a short-term rental (i.e. weekly rental) you are required to obtain a Cape Charles Business License through the Treasurer’s Office.”  And the minutes of the August 15, 2013, Town Council meeting report “an ongoing collection effort to obtain unpaid business license taxes.”</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Downs</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/vacation-rentals-license-to-kill-the-golden-goose/#comment-20979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Downs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 17:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=9379#comment-20979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for bringing this to the attention of the powers that be. Now the town minions will be all over the renters to collect tax money.
It should be don&#039;t ask, don&#039;t tell!

&lt;em&gt;Actually the purpose was to bring to the attention of the public that the Town HAS started to crack down on vacation rentals. --EDITOR&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing this to the attention of the powers that be. Now the town minions will be all over the renters to collect tax money.<br />
It should be don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell!</p>
<p><em>Actually the purpose was to bring to the attention of the public that the Town HAS started to crack down on vacation rentals. &#8211;EDITOR</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kearn Schemm</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/vacation-rentals-license-to-kill-the-golden-goose/#comment-20949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kearn Schemm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 15:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=9379#comment-20949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A key issue is who the town has chosen to enforce the &quot;business license&quot; against.  Are these people who have &quot;made waves&quot; or bothered the town in some way?  Is there arbitrary enforcement?  If less than 1% of owners have the license, this would seem on its face to be the situation. Strange that two properties exempt from the parking regulations belong to current or past town politicos.  

Another important article from the Wave!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A key issue is who the town has chosen to enforce the &#8220;business license&#8221; against.  Are these people who have &#8220;made waves&#8221; or bothered the town in some way?  Is there arbitrary enforcement?  If less than 1% of owners have the license, this would seem on its face to be the situation. Strange that two properties exempt from the parking regulations belong to current or past town politicos.  </p>
<p>Another important article from the Wave!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Glowinski</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/10/vacation-rentals-license-to-kill-the-golden-goose/#comment-20941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Glowinski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=9379#comment-20941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Encourage growth, don&#039;t hinder it. Otherwise just roll up the sidewalks and shut the town down. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Encourage growth, don&#8217;t hinder it. Otherwise just roll up the sidewalks and shut the town down. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
