<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: County Zoning Proposal Favors Highway Development</title>
	<atom:link href="https://capecharleswave.com/2013/12/county-zoning-proposal-favors-highway-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/12/county-zoning-proposal-favors-highway-development/</link>
	<description>Your Online Newspaper in Cape Charles, Virginia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 21:55:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Davis</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/12/county-zoning-proposal-favors-highway-development/#comment-26876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Austin Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=10373#comment-26876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should the County government wish to cancel Annexation Agreement terms, they should be reminded that they could forthwith be sent a bill for any water, sewer, policing, for any services the Town provides within those areas, and for the debt service on improvements within or consequent from the Annexation Agreement. A legal contract (aka: Agreement) cannot be unilaterally cancelled piece by piece. In order to avoid paying off-shore black suits to come argue the matter in court, a first step might be to remind the County Supervisors supporting this notion that they might not want to be known as someone who would attempt such a reprehensible act. I, personally, think better of some of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should the County government wish to cancel Annexation Agreement terms, they should be reminded that they could forthwith be sent a bill for any water, sewer, policing, for any services the Town provides within those areas, and for the debt service on improvements within or consequent from the Annexation Agreement. A legal contract (aka: Agreement) cannot be unilaterally cancelled piece by piece. In order to avoid paying off-shore black suits to come argue the matter in court, a first step might be to remind the County Supervisors supporting this notion that they might not want to be known as someone who would attempt such a reprehensible act. I, personally, think better of some of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Underhill</title>
		<link>https://capecharleswave.com/2013/12/county-zoning-proposal-favors-highway-development/#comment-26858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith Underhill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 04:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capecharleswave.com/?p=10373#comment-26858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until the county learns how to run the school system to teach, no one is going to move their family to the Shore. The restraints on new business are absurd. The county concentrates on keeping the administration funded. Everything else is second. How can the county survive when the school system and the county are the largest employer? It is like the snake feeding off its tail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until the county learns how to run the school system to teach, no one is going to move their family to the Shore. The restraints on new business are absurd. The county concentrates on keeping the administration funded. Everything else is second. How can the county survive when the school system and the county are the largest employer? It is like the snake feeding off its tail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
